Interview With Bill Wood, Former Navy SEAL, Provides Interesting Insight Into The Workings Of The Powers That Be (Video)

This video is quite long - 2 ½ hours. Please take the time to watch in its entirety. Although some of the topics discussed by Bill Wood may seem far-fetched, keep in mind that when it comes to our government and the uber-egotistical leaders we have put into office, almost anything is within the realm of possibility.

An interview with an ex-Navy Seal  who during the years 1992-2000 was sent on top secret bombing missions in the Middle East, predominantly in Iraq. Years after the first Gulf War when we were supposedly not at war with Iraq yet he and Seal Team 9 were targeting Tomahawk Missiles on a monthly basis taking out targets that were increasingly "soft"... involving deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians. Find out how this highly trained young man and his team were coerced by the military into purposely destroying villages and creating future terrorists as part of a plan that would ultimately serve their dark purpose, the "war on terror" and 9-11.

And if that weren't enough, hear how he was trained in Area 51 as a specially gifted group of highly classified psi spies to see beyond the famous Looking Glass technology into the future involving 2012 and beyond. 

Obama Administration Denies Christians The Right To Prayer at National Cemetery

The Obamanation and his Administration are once again imposing their position that we are not a Christian nation. Socialism is their call to order.

Wake Up America! The Trees Are In The Forest...

A Texas lawmaker is calling for a congressional investigation of the Houston National Cemetery after he went undercover and determined that cemetery officials are still preventing Christian prayers at the funerals of military veterans.

“The Obama administration continues to try to prevent the word ‘God’ from being used at the funerals of our heroes,” said. Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas).

“It’s unacceptable and I’m going to put a stop to it as fast as humanly possible,” Culberson told Fox News Radio. He attended a burial service at the cemetery undercover on July 8, when he says he witnessed volunteer members of the honor guard from the Veterans of Foreign Wars being prohibited from using any references to God.

“The Obama administration had told the nation and me they were not interfering with the prayer said over the graves of veterans,” he said. “And I went undercover to personally verify that claim.” VA officials have strongly denied they’ve banned any religious speech – and have offered support for Arleen Ocasio, the cemetery’s director.

“The idea that invoking the name of God or Jesus is banned at VA national cemeteries is blatantly false,” said VA Press Secretary Josh Taylor in a written statement to Fox News Radio. “The truth is, VA’s policy protects veterans’ families’ rights to pray however they choose at our national cemeteries.”

Taylor declined to comment on the pending lawsuit or other ongoing legal proceedings, but did say, “No one should make judgments before all the facts are known.” Culberson said the commander of the honor guard was told by cemetery officials to approach a grieving widow to reconfirm that she wanted the word God mentioned at her husband’s graveside service.

“He quite correctly said as a Texan and a man of honor and integrity, ‘I’m not bothering that poor woman at this most terrible time of her life. We’re going to do the ritual,’” Culberson said. “Right in front of me, the VA directly and deliberately attempted to prevent the VFW from doing their magnificent, spiritual ritual over the grave of this fallen hero."

The cemetery is already the focus of a lawsuit filed on behalf of the VFW, an American Legion post and Houston’s National Memorial Ladies. They claim the VA banned members of the organizations from using the words “God” or “Jesus” at burial services.

They also allege they were banned from reciting prayers or using religious language during services unless families approved the text in advance. Culberson, who oversees the sub-committee responsible for funding the cemetery, said that he wants the cemetery director fired – and he’s willing to do whatever possible to make sure that happens.

“The cemetery director has to leave,” he said. “I will zero out her salary. If she attempts to work for the VA anywhere in the state of Texas her salary will be zero.”

“It makes my skin crawl that liberals are attempting to drive prayer out of a funeral ceremony for our heroes,” Culberson said. “We’re going to fix this so that no Obama liberal bureaucrat will interfere with the funeral of a hero.”

But Taylor said the rules set in place at the cemetery are meant to protect the grieving families.

“Put simply, VA policy puts the wishes of the veteran’s family above all else on the day it matters most – the day they pay their final respects to their loved ones,” Taylor said. "Out of respect for the families, VA’s policy exists to prevent anyone from disrespecting or interfering with a veteran’s private committal service.”

Controversy first surfaced nationally at the cemetery during a Memorial Day event when a Houston pastor was ordered by the VA to remove the name of Jesus from his prayer.

Culberson said he hopes to hold hearings on the cemetery in the fall.

“They will bury 10 to 20 American heroes today and the Obama administration is preventing prayers from being said over their gravesites – today, ” Culberson said.

Article by Todd Starnes, FoxNews

The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore (Video)

In the United States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the U.S. Constitution.  Many among the elite are not even trying to hide how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore.  

As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution.  The level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution is unprecedented.  

It turns out that the U.S. Constitution does not fit very well with the benevolent futuristic "Big Brother" totalitarianism that they want to impose on all of us.  All of that talk about "freedom" and "liberty" in the Constitution does not exactly square with the centralized global planning that the elite have in mind.  The ruling elite believe that the "rights of the individual" must be greatly restricted for the "good of society" and for the "good of the environment".  Right now the "constitutional revival" that is happening in the United States is a direct threat to what the elite are trying to accomplish, so they are responding by openly attacking the Constitution.

At more than 90 percent of the law schools in the United States today, the U.S. Constitution is portrayed as a hopelessly outdated document that is in desperate need of revision or it is portrayed as a "living, breathing document" that we are free to alter as society "progresses".  In law schools across the country, law students are being taught that our founding fathers were racist, sexist, homophobic bigots that did the best that they could at the time.

Keep in mind that a very large percentage of our politicians and all of our judges go through these law schools.  I personally sat in law school classes and listened to law professors trash the U.S. Constitution.  This is really happening.

But these days it is apparently not enough to just poison the minds of law students.

Now the mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution.

The latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the cover with the words "Does It Still Matter?" emblazoned across it.

This front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution.

Rather, Stengel insists in his article that the U.S. Constitution "must accommodate each new generation and circumstance."

That is exactly the kind of thing that is constantly being pushed down the throats of law school students all over the country.  Stengel also declares in his article that we must not allow the Constitution to be "an obstacle" that will keep us from making the "progress" that we need to make as a society....

"We can pat ourselves on the back about the past 223 years, but we cannot let the Constitution become an obstacle to the U.S.'s moving into the future with a sensible health care system, a globalized economy, an evolving sense of civil and political rights."

This is typical of what the elite will do.  They will applaud the Constitution as being a good document "for the past" but then they will talk about how we "need to move forward" because people are so much smarter now than they were back then.

The reality is that many elitists love to denigrate the circumstances under which the Constitution was drafted and they love to talk about how much more "sophisticated" we are today.

In an article entitled "Is It Time To Update The U.S. Constitution?" CNN's Fareed Zakaria recently declared that it was time to reexamine our founding document that was created in a "cramped room" that had "shades drawn over the windows"....

By contrast, any talk of revising or revisiting the U.S. Constitution is, of course, seen as heresy. The United States Constitution was, as you know, drafted in a cramped room in Philadelphia in 1787 with shades drawn over the windows. It was signed by 39 people.

But Zakaria was kind compared to a lot of the other pundits out there.

On an ABC News political talk show over the weekend, Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson declared that there are "some gaps, some holes, lacunas, gulfs, abysses" in the Constitution and he went on to make the following statement....

"When it makes the transition from parchment to pavement, there again is the rub. The reality is when I talk about the document being living and vital, I’m talking about the interpretation of it. I’m talking about the meaning of it."

Do you know why elitists love to talk about the Constitution being a "living" document?

It is because they feel like they have permission to change and "reinterpret" a document that is "living and breathing".

Elitists love the idea that the U.S. Constitution "evolves", and of course they believe that it is the role of the ruling elite to direct this "evolution".

James Altucher, managing partner at Formula Capital, expressed his opinion of the U.S. Constitution in his recent article entitled "July 4th Is A Scam"....

Most importantly, lets not view the Constitution as gospel. Countries, people, systems, technology evolves. As they do, its important to see what from the past is good and what can be discarded.

What can be "discarded"?

Absolutely disgusting.

But there are others out there that go even farther in trashing the Constitution.

So far we have examined quotes from elitists that show at least a few shreds of respect for the Constitution.  They desperately want to change it and reinterpret it, but at least they acknowledge that is has played a beneficial role in American history.

There are others among the elite that are not afraid to openly declare hate for the U.S. Constitution.

For example, Michael Klarman of Harvard University Law School delivered a Constitution Day lecture at Johns Hopkins University last September 16th. His lecture was entitled "A Skeptical View of Constitution Worship", and it was a blistering assault on the U.S. Constitution.

Klarman made four major points about "constitutional idolatry" in his speech....

I have four points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country.
(1) The Framers’ constitution, to a large degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today.
(2) There are parts of the Constitution with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values.
(3) For the most part, the Constitution is irrelevant to the current political design of our nation.
(4) The rights protections we do enjoy today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them.

Remember, this is not some nutjob that was making this speech.

This was a professor of law at Harvard University.

Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard University.  Hordes of our future politicians and judges and law professors go through that place.

Klarman is not someone to be taken lightly.

Klarman's remarks were noticed over at The Economist.  It is an open secret that The Economist is a mouthpiece for the global banking elite and they were quite taken with what Klarman had to say.  They published an article supporting Klarman's ideas that was entitled "The Perils Of Constitution-Worship".

In that article, those who love and support the U.S. Constitution were described as "infantile"....

Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century.

In the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution. Either the "constitutional revival" being spearheaded by the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite and the mainstream media will eventually win.

The stakes are incredibly high.  Just consider what Alex Jones has to say about the matter in the video posted below....

So will you stand up for the U.S. Constitution?

Great tests for this nation are coming.  We are standing right on the verge of the economic collapse of America, and that will be a great time of challenge for the United States.  Our loyalty to the Constitution will be pressed to the limit as society descends into anarchy.

Our politicians are supposed to take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.  But sadly, most of our politicians today seem to think that the Constitution should be serving them.

In fact, this very attitude was clearly expressed in the Time Magazine article mentioned above....

"The Constitution serves the nation; the nation does not serve the Constitution."

The inference, of course, is that once we have made enough "progress" we will be able to toss aside the U.S. Constitution like some sort of used rag.

Well, the reality is that there are tens of millions of red-blooded Americans that are not ready to give up on the U.S. Constitution.

If you are an American that still believes in liberty and freedom, don't be afraid to let your voice be heard, because if none of us stand up the America that so many of us grew up loving will soon cease to exist.

Article courtesy of The American Dream