
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Thursday, October 2, 2008
U.S. Troops In Homeland “Crowd Control” Patrols From October 1st
Please read this reprinted article then write your representative in Washington to demand a repeal of this action, or face the possibility of US troops patrolling your streets to protect the crooks on Wall Street and in Washington from YOU!
U.S. Troops In Homeland “Crowd Control” Patrols From October 1st
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
This shocking admission was calmly reported on September 8th by the Army Times website, which reports that from the beginning of next month the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team “Will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.”
The article notes that the deployment “marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.”
The purpose of the unit’s patrols includes helping “with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.”
The unit will be on homeland patrol for at least 20 months before returning to
Training for homeland operations has already begun at
Ominously, the report states that, “The 1st BCT’s soldiers also will learn how to use “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded,” 1st BCT commander Col. Roger Cloutier said, referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.”
The unit would also be deployed to deal with hostile crowds of Americans in the aftermath of a massive economic depression, potential food riots and race riots, if one defines the term “crowd control” to match its reasonably applicable scenarios.
The open admission that U.S. troops will be involved in law enforcement operations as well as potentially using non-lethal weapons against American citizens is a complete violation of the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act, which substantially limit the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement unless under precise and extreme circumstances.
Section 1385 of the Posse Comitatus Act states, “Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
Under the John Warner Defense Authorization Act, signed by President Bush on October 17, 2006, the law was changed to state, “The President may employ the armed forces to restore public order in any State of the United States the President determines hinders the execution of laws or deprives people of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.”
However, these changes were repealed in their entirety by HR 4986: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, reverting back to the original state of the Insurrection Act of 1807.
The original text of the Insurrection Act severely limits the power of the President to deploy troops within the
For troops to be deployed, a condition has to exist that, “(1) So hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.”
Is the Bush administration and Northcom waiting for such a scenario to unfold, an event that completely overwhelms state authorities, before unleashing the might of the U.S. Army against the American people?
The deployment of National Guard troops to aid law enforcement or for disaster relief purposes is legal under the authority of the governor of a state, but using active duty U.S. Army in law enforcement operations inside
With the promise of an “October surprise” on behalf of Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda being bandied about by the media and the potential for civil unrest should a complete collapse of the U.S. economy unfold, the presence of U.S. troops inside America, returning fresh from kicking down doors, arresting “insurgents” and taking them to internment camps in Iraq, should put Americans on alert and provoke urgent questions about the legality of U.S. Army units engaging in law enforcement operations against American citizens.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
The Energy NON-Crisis
Click on this link to see the video of Mr. Williams telling you about global control being financed by oil.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Transfer of Wealth
For the last few months, we have seen commercials from T. Boone Pickens, and campaign ads from both Obama and McCain warning us about “the largest transfer of wealth in history..” in reference to our addiction to foreign oil.
The truth is: For the last 7 1/2 years we HAVE seen the largest transfer of wealth in history but this transfer of wealth is to the already wealthiest people in the US .
The average taxpayer has suffered the loss of; jobs, inflation adjustments on income, home equity, life’s savings, retirement savings, and quality of retirement (if able to retire at all). Yet that wise old banker Bernanke said the Treasury plan should have taxpayers (that means YOU!) buy the assets and hold them at close to their maturity value. In other words, he wants YOU to buy these nearly worthless assets that no one else in their right mind would buy.
Furthermore he went on to say “Removing the assets, would bring liquidity back to markets, unfreeze credit markets, reduce uncertainty and allow banks to attract private capital. We cannot impose punitive measures on institutions that choose to sell assets. The beneficiaries would be not just the companies selling, but markets and the overall economy.”
What he is telling you, Mr./Mrs./Ms. Average American Citizen is that it is YOU who should pay for the gross malfeasance of the current White House administration and those crooks on Wall Street.
Why should I have to pay for their incompetence you ask? The answer my fellow Americans is easy if you have been paying attention for the last eight-tenths of a decade. It's because our bankers are too big a fish to fry! Yes, that's right! So…. it is YOU that must fry in their place.
This whole financial mess did not need to take place. It was not pre-ordained. It happened because of greed on a monumental scale. All sanctioned by YOUR representatives in Washington .
As a voter, you have a choice of who you vote into office.
WAKE UP AMERICA !
Monday, March 31, 2008
HELL-ary's Mouth!
"Where is the G-dam f***ing flag? I want the G-dam f***ing flag up every f***ing morning at f***ing sunrise."From the book "Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 (Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor's mansion on Labor Day, 1991)
"You sold out, you m***er-f***er! You sold out!" From the book "Inside" by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - (Hillary yelling at a Democrat lawyer.)
"F*** off! It's enough that I have to see you sh**-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*dam job and keep your mouth shut." From the book "American Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - (Hillary to her State Trooper body-guards after one of them
greeted her with "Good Morning.")
"You f** *ing idiot." From the book "Crossfire" p. 84 - (Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.)
"If you want to remain on this detail, get your f***ing ass over here and grab those bags!" From the book "The First Partner" p. 259 - (Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)
"Get f***ed! Get the f*** out of my way!!! Get out of my face!" From the book "Hillary's Scheme" p. 89 - (Hillary's various comments to her Secret Service detail agents.)
"Stay the f*** back, stay the f*** away from me! Don't come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f***ing do as I say, Okay?" From the book "Unlimited Access", by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139
"Where's the miserable c**k sucker?" (Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail) From the book "The Truth About Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5 - (Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer)
"Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!" From the book "Dereliction of Duty" p. 71-72 - (Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while enroute to Air Force One.)
"Son of a bitch." (Hillary's opinion of President George W. Bush when she found out he secretly visited
"What are you doing inviting these people into my home? These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!" (Hillary screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans hadbeen invited to the Clinton White House) From the book "The Survivor" by John Harris, p. 99
"Come on Bill, put your d**k up! You can't f*** her here!!" (Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female at an
"You know, I'm going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I'm going to start thinking of her as a human being." From the book "The Case against Hillary Clinton" by Peggy Noonan, p. 55
"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices....Government has to make those choices for people. " (Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan.) From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 20
This ill-tempered, violent, foul- mouthed, hateful, abusive, woman wants to be your President. The important question is: Do you really want HER?
Thursday, March 20, 2008
So?
On
Stunned, Martha Raddatz responded, “You don't care what the American people think?" The Dick answered back, "You can't be blown off course by polls." He tried to smooth that asinine comment over by adding, "This president is very courageous and determined to go the course. There has been a huge fundamental change and transformation for the better. That's a huge accomplishment."
I’ve got another question for The Dick. “Just who in the hell do you think you work for?” Wait, before you say something that is really going to piss me off, let me answer for you. You work for me! And every other American! All of us insignificant peons whom you can’t be bothered to be “blown off course” by.
It is high time you high and mighty in office come to realize that EVERY
That’s right. We are your employer. It is to us you owe your loyalty and servitude. So… the next time you see a poll taken by your employers saying that two-thirds of us do not agree with what you are doing, you had better wipe that nasty little Darth Vader smirk off your face and pay attention!
In the event The Dick does not agree with me, I have only one thing to say to him. “So?”
Thursday, February 28, 2008
"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."
When President George was taking questions today regarding
I myself subscribe to the Rip Van Winkle theory of economics..I’ll just fall asleep and wake up 20 years from now when this whole Bush fiasco is but a bad dream.